ORGANIZATIONAL MONITOR

Measure your organization's climate and watch how it evolves

Build climate projects adapted to your reality using 32 predefined metrics, modifying them or creating your own. Configure participation, segment the results, protect anonymity and run re-assessments to understand not only how the organization is today, but also how it changes after you act.

SURVEY vs MONITOR

A one-off survey tells you how you are. A monitor helps you track what changes.

A climate measurement can answer:

How do people perceive certain aspects of the organization today?

But many organizations also need to answer:

  • Where are the main differences?
  • Which groups experience different realities?
  • What do we want to improve?
  • Has anything changed after acting?

Talent360 lets you turn a one-off assessment into a tracking process.

Initial measurementDiagnosisPrioritiesActionsRe-assessmentComparisonEvolution

Don't measure climate just to get a snapshot. Use re-assessments to observe its evolution.

32predefined metrics

And you don't have to use them all. Build the climate you really want to measure

Talent360 includes 32 organizational climate metrics available in the system. They relate to areas such as:

Interaction
Structure
Operation
Identity
Corporate integration
Performance
Working conditions
Socio-labor conditions
Within them we find questions related to communication, teamwork, conflict, leadership, roles, coordination, proactivity, decision-making, values, objectives, feedback, resources, remuneration, work-life balance, equality, workplace flexibility and other dimensions of the organizational experience.

But the library is not a closed questionnaire. The user can:

select the metrics they need
adapt existing metrics
create their own metrics

Your organization doesn't have to adapt to our survey. You can adapt the measurement to your organization.

Start with General Climate or build your own model

Talent360 includes a predefined General Climate set for those who want to start with an already configured structure. But you can also:

create your own sets
select which metrics belong to them
adapt them to different projects
create specific models for different objectives

GENERAL CLIMATE SET

Ready to use

OR

YOUR OWN SET

Talent360 metrics
Adapted metrics
Custom metrics

This lets you use Organizational Monitor for much more than a single standard corporate survey.

CONFIGURE THE PROJECT

Design the project around your organization

Configure what to measure, how to ask and how to participate. Among the project options you can configure aspects such as:

Illustrative example · sample data
Interaction
Structure
Operation
Identity
Corporate integration
Performance
Working conditions
Socio-labor conditions

Illustrative example: project configuration.

Metrics

Select the set of metrics that will be used.

Desired target

Lets you add a reference for where you want to be, in addition to measuring current perception.

Comments

The project can allow comments to complement scores with qualitative information.

Don't know / No answer

Can be enabled so a person doesn't have to rate something they don't have enough information about.

Languages

Select the languages available for each project.

Title and instructions

Customize the communication the participant receives.

Segmentation

Define groups and variables that later allow you to analyze differences between collectives.

Participation type

Choose the access system best suited to the level of anonymity and tracking required.

You don't just decide what to ask. You also decide how you want to listen.

TWO FORMS OF ANONYMITY

Two levels of anonymity depending on what the project needs

"Anonymity" can mean different things. That's why this difference must be very clear.

1. Fully anonymous participation

Shared link per segment

Participants access through a shared link.

This lets you collect responses within the corresponding segment without individually identifying who participated.

Suitable when the top priority is preserving the person's anonymity.

GROUP LINK

Anonymous
We don't know who responded
We do know the segment

2. Anonymous responses with participation tracking

Personal link

Each participant receives an individual link. This lets you know:

  • who has responded
  • and who has not yet participated

but without linking the participant's identity to the specific answers they submitted.

PERSONAL LINK

Participation tracking
We know who responded
We do NOT know what they responded
SEGMENTATION

Segment to discover different realities

A general average can hide important information.

Talent360 lets you structure participants through segmentations to understand differences within the organization. For example:

ORGANIZATION

REGION

EuropeAmericas

AREA

SalesOperationsAdministration

The real report shows precisely global results and results differentiated by segments, allowing you to compare perception and desired state between groups.

What is our climate?Where are we living different realities?

Perceived state vs desired state

Don't limit yourself to knowing where you are. When the project includes a desired target, Talent360 can compare the perceived state and the desired state by areas and metrics.

PERCEIVED STATE

How do we experience it now?

DESIRED STATE

How do we believe it should be?

GAP

The real report represents that comparison both at the area level and in the detail of each metric.

7092

A 70 may seem acceptable in isolation. But if the group considers it should be at 92, there is a gap that deserves attention.

1–10 / EMOJIS

Two ways to rate

Use the response experience suited to the project. Talent360 lets you configure different rating systems.

1 to 10 scale

Allows a detailed rating and working with fractions.

Emojis

Offers a more visual and intuitive experience when the project context makes it convenient.

We don't present one as better than the other. The choice depends on:

the project objectivethe level of detail neededthe desired response experience
FROM THE GLOBAL RESULT TO THE DETAIL

Understand the organization first. Then dig deeper.

The report allows different levels of reading.

1

Participation

Shows the volume of responses and the use of "Don't know / No answer". The sample report presents both total participation and participation by segments.

2

Rating by areas

Lets you compare major areas of the organization.

3

Rating by segments

Shows differences between the groups defined in the project.

4

Detail by metric

Descends from each area to the specific aspects assessed.

5

Perceived vs desired state

Lets you detect the distance from the level participants consider appropriate.

6

Visual charts

General and detailed representations make it easy to spot patterns quickly. The report includes both a global chart by areas and a radar with the detail of the metrics.

7

Response distribution

Helps you understand whether an average reflects consensus or hides very different experiences.

The average doesn't always tell the whole story

This idea is conceptually important. Imagine one same average hiding opposite realities.

AVERAGE = 7

CASE A

6 · 7 · 7 · 8

Relatively homogeneous perception

CASE B

3 · 3 · 10 · 10

Completely polarized perceptions

The average is the same.

The organizational reality is not.

That's why distributions, segments and detailed data help interpret results with more context.

PDF report + on-screen analysis

Use the information the way you need. Talent360 offers different ways to work with the results.

PDF report

Generates a structured view of the project to share or review.

On-screen data and charts

Let you navigate the results directly from the platform and dig into different perspectives.

Export to Excel

Download the data to continue analysis through People Analytics, corporate reporting, internal models, presentations or other additional analyses.

RE-ASSESSMENTS

From measuring once to measuring evolution

Re-assess and observe what is changing.

A project can include re-assessments, avoiding having to start from scratch every time you want to measure again. This lets you compare different moments:

T0Initial measurementActionsT1Re-assessmentComparison · New actionsT2Re-assessment

This way the organization can observe:

  • which metrics evolve
  • which gaps decrease
  • which areas remain stable
  • which groups experience different changes
  • where action is still needed

The question is no longer just "how are we?" and becomes also "are we making progress?".

Measure the effect, without confusing evolution with causality

If a score improves after an action, we know perception has changed.

But that doesn't automatically prove that a single initiative was the exclusive cause of the change.

The Monitor helps observe evolution and generate questions, not establish automatic causality.

Much more than an annual survey

Use the Monitor according to the organization's moment.

General climate

Get a global view of the organizational experience.

Improvement plan tracking

Re-assess after intervening to observe the evolution.

Change processes

Create specific metrics to listen to people before, during or after a transformation.

Leadership

Dig into perceptions related to managers, leadership or leadership styles.

Internal communication

Analyze specific issues of information, channels, coordination or transparency.

Culture

Use predefined, adapted or custom metrics to explore relevant aspects of the cultural experience.

Group experience

Use segmentations to understand how different groups experience the organization.

Working and socio-labor conditions

Analyze factors related to conditions, work-life balance, equality, flexibility or other relevant variables.

From data to priorities

A result is not yet an action plan.

The Monitor can show:

where a gap exists
which segments experience a different situation
which metrics receive worse ratings
where there are discrepancies
what is improving or worsening
But the next question remains: Why is it happening?

That's why the correct sequence is:

ListenMeasureSegmentCompareTalkUnderstandPrioritizeActRe-assess

Not:

Low scoreAutomatic solution
PRIVACY AND TRUST

People respond better when they understand how the information will be used

Climate projects must clearly communicate:

what is being assessed
what the information will be used for
what type of anonymity has been configured
who will have access to the results
how the groups will be analyzed

Talent360 offers different participation models to adapt the level of anonymity and tracking to the project's needs.

Listening to the organization requires data. Getting honest answers requires trust.

Climate reflects perceptions, not absolute truths

The results show how participating people perceive certain aspects of their organizational experience at a given moment.

A low score does not automatically identify:

  • the cause
  • a person responsible
  • the solution that should be applied
  • or the future impact on the business

The data helps identify where to look and what is worth understanding better.

Frequently asked questions

FROM MEASUREMENT TO EVOLUTION

Listen to your organization better and see how it changes

Build the project you need, protect participation, analyze differences between groups and measure again to understand how the climate evolves.