Understand how your team works and turn its differences into an advantage
A team doesn't improve simply by bringing talented people together. It needs to understand what each member contributes, how their styles interact, how the group works as a system and what it needs to develop to reach its goals. Talent360 combines DISC, Team Maps and Systemic Assessment to move from individual knowledge to a complete view of collective functioning.
A team is more than the sum of its members
You can know each person perfectly and still not understand why the team:
- coordinates well or poorly;
- gets stuck when making decisions;
- turns differences into conflict;
- loses focus;
- depends too much on certain people;
- has unclear roles;
- doesn't receive enough feedback;
- or feels it lacks the necessary support from the organization.
That's why there are two different questions:
How does each person contribute to the team?
How is the team working as a whole?
Talent360 lets you work on both.
Two perspectives. A more complete view.
DISC and Teamwork Styles
How does each person contribute?
Helps understand each member's work style, their strengths, potential challenges and how they can relate to other styles.
Systemic Team Assessment
How do we work together?
Analyzes collective functioning across areas such as interaction, structure, functioning, identity, integration and performance.
Each person contributes to the team in a different way
Talent360 has a specific DISC Teamwork Style module. The goal isn't to classify people as «good» or «bad» team members. It's to understand:
- where they usually add the most value;
- what strengths they can put at the service of the group;
- what aspects they need to watch;
- how their way of working may complement or create tension with other styles.
Knowing the style helps understand how someone contributes, where they generate the most value and what to watch in order to collaborate better.
11 DISC teamwork styles
Talent360 identifies 11 teamwork styles:
Implementer
Turns plans, agreements and ideas into concrete actions.
Driver
Brings drive, speed and a focus on progress.
Innovator
Generates different ideas and possibilities.
Promoter
Mobilizes, communicates and generates enthusiasm.
Cohesion-builder
Fosters connection, participation and cohesion.
Cooperator
Brings continuity, reliability and support.
Coordinator
Connects efforts and helps organize collective action.
Evaluator
Analyzes, questions and brings judgment.
Advisor
Brings knowledge, depth and guidance.
Achiever
Maintains determination and a focus on achievement.
Completer
Helps sustain follow-through and close what has been started.
They aren't exhaustive psychometric labels: they reflect that there are many different ways to add value to a team.
There is no single ideal team-member style
A team made up only of people who:
can have important strengths, but also leave other needs poorly covered.
The goal isn't for everyone to work the same way. It's to understand how to make the most of the team's diversity.
Diversity of styles can add value, but it can also produce tension when ways of prioritizing, communicating or moving forward don't match.
Visualize the team on a DISC Map
From 11 individual profiles to a collective picture
Talent360 lets you generate a Team DISC Map that graphically positions the assessed people according to their teamwork style. This way you can visualize:
- which styles predominate;
- what diversity exists;
- which styles are less represented;
- where complementarities may exist;
- where differences in priorities, pace or communication may appear.
Talent360's graphical representation shows the styles distributed around the map and points out possible tension zones associated with priorities, pace or ways of communicating.
See DISC MapsDifferences aren't the problem
The problem appears when we don't know how to work with them
Two different styles can complement each other perfectly. One person can bring speed while another brings analysis; one can bring creativity and another execution; one can drive results and another cohesion.
The problem appears when each member interprets the other's way of working as:
The Teamwork module analyzes how one style may relate to the others and where complementarities or tensions may arise.
Understanding the difference lets you stop taking it personally and start managing it.
Improve communication between different styles
Talent360 can provide information on:
The communication module analyzes how ideas are expressed, how people listen and how agreements are built, and proposes adjustments according to the other person's style.
In addition, DISC strategies consider that adapting tone, pace, level of detail and the way ideas are presented can reduce friction and improve collaboration.
Understanding people doesn't explain the whole team
After looking at the people, look at the system they form together
A team can have perfectly complementary profiles and still struggle because:
- roles aren't clear;
- coordination fails;
- leadership doesn't respond to its needs;
- there isn't enough focus;
- goals aren't aligned;
- the organization doesn't provide the necessary resources;
- or feedback doesn't work.
That's why Talent360 incorporates a Systemic Team Assessment.
Six areas to understand collective functioning
The Systemic Assessment analyzes six broad areas:
Interaction
What the team's interpersonal and communicative dynamics are like.
Communication · Camaraderie · Conflicts · Attitude
Structure
How the team organizes itself internally and manages responsibilities.
Roles · Leadership · Responsibility · Coordination
Functioning
How the team approaches work and decisions.
Proactivity · Decision-making · Work pace · Focus
Identity
How it understands its mission, its values and its sense as a unit.
Vision and Mission · Values · Position · Unity
Integration
How the team relates to the organization.
Resources · Internal communication · Support · Contribution
Performance
How the team aligns with goals, planning, feedback and results.
Goals · Planning · Feedback · Results
24 dimensions. A view of the team as a system.
which person has the problem
what is happening in collective functioning
That difference is very important.
Perceived vs desired
Knowing where we are is useful. Knowing where we want to be is even more so.
The systemic report compares perceived state with desired state, both across the six areas and in the specific dimensions.
Perceived state
How do we work today?
Desired state
How do we think we should work?
An isolated score doesn't necessarily indicate what's a priority. The distance from what's desired adds context.
Two different maps of the same team
DISC Map
Which styles make up the team?
Helps visualize the people and their behavioral diversity.
Systemic Assessment
How does the team work as a whole?
Helps understand the team's collective functioning.
One of the solution's biggest differentiators.
Don't confuse diversity with incompatibility
A DISC map can show very different styles. That doesn't automatically mean the team will have conflicts. And very similar styles don't guarantee the team works well either.
Diversity can bring:
- different perspectives;
- complementary capabilities;
- different ways of solving problems;
- balance between action, people and analysis.
Does the team know how to make the most of that diversity?
That's where DISC and Systemic complement each other especially well.
From diagnosis to better conversations
This solution shouldn't end at the charts. The results should let the team talk about questions such as:
From differences to team agreements
The results can be used to build agreements about:
The manager also needs to understand the team
Talent360 also provides DISC information that can help the manager understand how to lead, motivate and give feedback to people with different styles.
The specific module of recommendations for managers starts from the premise that leading effectively requires adapting communication, autonomy, follow-up and support to each person's style.
Developing the team also means developing the manager's ability to lead different people.Leadership development
A team also needs to fit with its environment
Collective functioning doesn't depend exclusively on what happens inside the team. The systemic assessment includes an Integration dimension, which analyzes aspects such as resources, communication with the organization, support and contribution to corporate goals.
That's important because a team can have good internal relationships but face:
- lack of resources;
- little organizational clarity;
- poor communication with other areas;
- lack of recognition;
- or a weak connection to the company's goals.
Not all of a team's problems originate within the team.
A report doesn't improve a team on its own
When the team needs to develop new capabilities
Some needs may require learning related to:
Talent360Academy lets you continue the journey toward training when the detected need is genuinely a training need.
Explore Talent360AcademyWhen the team needs support
Some situations require more than a report or a course. Talent360Consulting lets you find independent consultants from the ecosystem to work on:
- team development;
- facilitation;
- leadership;
- interpretation of results;
- action plans;
- collective dynamics.
Not every team problem is solved with team building
A team-building activity can be useful. But if the real problem is:
- unclear roles;
- lack of coordination;
- misaligned goals;
- inadequate leadership;
- poor communication with the organization;
- or absence of feedback,
a one-off activity may not solve the cause.
First understand what's happening. Then decide what intervention the team needs.
Use cases
Developing an existing team
Understand strengths, styles, dynamics and areas for improvement.
Creating a new team
Get to know the diversity of styles and facilitate agreements from the start.
Teams with friction
Analyze differences in style and collective functioning without reducing the problem to certain people.
Leadership teams
Combine leadership styles, teamwork and systemic functioning.
Mergers or reorganizations
Helps understand how people from different contexts begin to work together.
Remote or hybrid teams
Adds information about communication, collaboration and adaptation to different work environments.
Teams with coordination problems
Digs into roles, responsibilities, pace, focus and decision-making.
Teams that want to move from «functioning» to improving
Uses the desired state to identify the distance between current reality and the level the team wants to reach.
Who it's for
Human Resources
To design team-development processes based on information.
Managers
To better understand how to contribute, communicate and lead within the team.
Leadership
To work with key teams and leadership teams.
People & Culture
To connect team functioning, leadership and organizational experience.
Consultants and Coaches
To use the results as a basis for interventions and collective-development processes.
Team members
To better understand what they contribute and what others contribute.
Development, not labeling
A style doesn't define a person's value within the team
The DISC style doesn't determine:
- who works best;
- who is indispensable;
- who generates conflict;
- or who should leave the team.
It provides a behavioral perspective.
Likewise, a systemic score doesn't automatically identify «who's to blame». Its goal is to help understand collective functioning.
The goal isn't to classify people. It's to help the team work better with the people who make it up.
From understanding the team to developing its collective capability
Talent360Center
Assess people and teams from different perspectives.
Combines DISC, Team Maps and Systemic Assessment to understand individual styles and collective functioning.
Discover CenterTalent360Academy
Turn certain needs into learning.
Develops capabilities related to communication, leadership, collaboration and other detected needs.
Explore AcademyTalent360Consulting
Add professional support.
Find independent consultants to facilitate team development, interpretation and improvement processes.
Find a consultantFrequently asked questions
Turn your team's differences into information to work better together
Understand what each person contributes, visualize the diversity of styles and analyze how the team works as a whole to identify strengths, gaps and development priorities.